Exercises §12 — Ross, Elementary Analysis, 2nd Edition

Exercise 12.1. Let \((s_n)\) and \((t_n)\) be sequences and suppose there exists \(N_0\) such that \(s_n \le t_n\) for all \(n > N_0\). Show \(\liminf s_n \le \liminf t_n\) and \(\limsup s_n \le \limsup t_n\).

Proof. Recall Definition 10.6: for a sequence \((x_n)\), \[ \limsup x_n = \lim_{N \to \infty} \sup\{x_n : n > N\}, \qquad \liminf x_n = \lim_{N \to \infty} \inf\{x_n : n > N\}. \]

For every \(N \ge N_0\) we have \(\{n : n > N\} \subseteq \{n : n > N_0\}\), so \(s_n \le t_n\) holds for every \(n > N\). Taking suprema and infima over the tail \(\{n : n > N\}\) preserves the inequality: \[ \sup\{s_n : n > N\} \le \sup\{t_n : n > N\}, \qquad \inf\{s_n : n > N\} \le \inf\{t_n : n > N\}. \]

Passing to the limit as \(N \to \infty\) (limits preserve \(\le\)) and applying Definition 10.6 gives \[ \begin{aligned} \limsup s_n &= \lim_{N \to \infty} \sup\{s_n : n > N\} && \text{[Def.\ 10.6]} \\ &\le \lim_{N \to \infty} \sup\{t_n : n > N\} && \text{[$\sup$ inequality on the tail, limits preserve $\le$]} \\ &= \limsup t_n, && \text{[Def.\ 10.6]} \end{aligned} \] and likewise \[ \begin{aligned} \liminf s_n &= \lim_{N \to \infty} \inf\{s_n : n > N\} && \text{[Def.\ 10.6]} \\ &\le \lim_{N \to \infty} \inf\{t_n : n > N\} && \text{[$\inf$ inequality on the tail, limits preserve $\le$]} \\ &= \liminf t_n. && \text{[Def.\ 10.6]} \end{aligned} \] \(\square\)


Exercise 12.10. Prove \((s_n)\) is bounded if and only if \(\limsup |s_n| < +\infty\).

Proof. (\(\Rightarrow\)) Suppose \((s_n)\) is bounded. Then there exist \(M_1, M_2 \in \mathbb{R}\) such that \(M_1 \le s_n \le M_2\) for all \(n \in \mathbb{N}\). Let \(M = \max\{|M_1|, |M_2|\}\). Then \(|s_n| \le M\) for all \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), so \((|s_n|)\) is bounded and \[ \limsup |s_n| \le M < +\infty. \]

(\(\Leftarrow\)) Suppose \(\limsup |s_n| < +\infty\). Since \(0 \le |s_n|\) for all \(n \in \mathbb{N}\), we have \(0 \le \limsup |s_n|\).

Case 1: \(\limsup |s_n| = 0\). Then \(0 \le \liminf |s_n| \le \limsup |s_n| = 0\), so \(\liminf |s_n| = \limsup |s_n| = 0\), which gives \(\lim |s_n| = 0\). A convergent sequence is bounded (Theorem 9.1), so \((|s_n|)\) is bounded, and hence so is \((s_n)\).

Case 2: \(0 < \limsup |s_n| < +\infty\). Let \(L = \limsup |s_n|\) and take \(\varepsilon = 1\). By definition of \(\limsup\) there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \[ |s_n| < L + 1 \quad \text{for all } n \ge N. \] Thus only the finitely many terms \(|s_1|, \ldots, |s_{N-1}|\) can exceed \(L + 1\). Let \[ M = \max\{|s_1|, \ldots, |s_{N-1}|, \, L + 1\}. \] Then \(0 \le |s_n| \le M\) for all \(n\), so \((|s_n|)\) is bounded, and \(-M \le s_n \le M\) for all \(n\), which means \((s_n)\) is bounded. \(\square\)


Exercise 12.11. Let \((s_n)\) be any sequence of nonzero real numbers. Prove that \[ \liminf \left| \frac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right| \le \liminf |s_n|^{1/n}. \]

Proof. Let \(L = \liminf \left| \dfrac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right|\) and \(\alpha = \liminf |s_n|^{1/n}\). We must prove \(\alpha \ge L\). This is immediate if \(L = 0\) (since \(\alpha \ge 0\)), so assume \(L > 0\). To prove \(\alpha \ge L\) it suffices to prove \(\alpha \ge L_1\) for any \(L_1\) with \(0 < L_1 < L\).

Since \[ L = \liminf \left| \frac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right| = \lim_{N \to \infty} \inf\left\{ \left| \frac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right| : n \ge N \right\} > L_1, \] there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that \(\inf\left\{ \left| \dfrac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right| : n \ge N \right\} > L_1\). Thus \[ \left| \frac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right| > L_1 \quad \text{for all } n \ge N. \]

So for all \(n > N\) we can write, telescoping the ratios, \[ |s_n| = \left| \frac{s_n}{s_{n-1}} \right| \cdot \left| \frac{s_{n-1}}{s_{n-2}} \right| \cdots \left| \frac{s_{N+1}}{s_N} \right| \cdot |s_N|. \] There are \(n - (N+1) + 1 = n - N\) fractions, each exceeding \(L_1\), so \[ |s_n| > L_1^{\,n-N} |s_N| \quad \text{for all } n > N. \] Let \(a = L_1^{-N} |s_N| > 0\). Then \(|s_n| \ge a\, L_1^{\,n}\), and therefore \[ |s_n|^{1/n} \ge a^{1/n} L_1. \] Since \(\lim_{n \to \infty} a^{1/n} = 1\), taking \(\liminf\) of both sides gives \[ \liminf |s_n|^{1/n} \ge L_1. \] As \(L_1 \in (0, L)\) was arbitrary, we conclude \[ \liminf |s_n|^{1/n} \ge L = \liminf \left| \frac{s_{n+1}}{s_n} \right|. \qquad \square \]